It is truly about time someone put this all together. Fortunately, I stand on the shoulders of giants. Mr. Corsi is one.
I had a dream the other day, well, night, that I was attempting to extract snakes from the proverbial grass. This imagery may have been brought on by the many recent news reports of an abundance of pythons within the everglades, or perhaps you could think of the serpent in E.DIN.
Someone was standing a few yards away from me (and was helping me get at these snakes) and would pull the head of their snake from their side, but then mine would retreat simultaneously from my grasp on the head end which I was handling, and conversely, when I would pull, their snake would retreat.
Somehow, a machete materialized in my hand and I began to hack away at the grass and weeds in which the snake was hiding, as did my compatriot. Eventually we managed to hack away at the grass to a large enough extent that we could spot other snakes hiding in the weeds as well.
As we continued to pull and hack away, it became apparent that both of the ends of our snakes were somehow tied together, so that we were actually pulling on the same two headed snake. As we cleared more brush it became even more apparent that all of the snakes which were present in the weeds were actually part of the same animal.
Then the ground shook, the brushy area in front of us bulged upward, and out of the soil arose a stone granite Medusa-head, atop of which all the snakes were joined. I was taken aback, but that was where the dream ended as I woke up. I mulled it over, and went back to sleep to a different, slightly less weird dream.
The next night, Jerome Corsi was on Coast.
For any of you who still have not heard (of) Coast to Coast AM (formerly with Art Bell, now with George Noory), I strongly suggest that you wiki it or just go visit the website. In the first two hours of the show, Corsi was on, and he spoke of receiving about a thousand pages of documents from a HSBC Banking employee turned whistleblower named John Cruz.
As Corsi told it, Cruz started out life being poor, his mother having died and his father having left the family. Living with his grandparents, he got through school and then worked his way up through positions in various banks until he got a break working to expand the client base and clients’ services for HSBC in 2008. He was finally paid rather well at HSBC.
Cruz worked at the NYC branch of HSBC and was given business client account information for which he was to use to contact clients and attempt to have those clients purchase more services from HSBC. He was basically a mid-level marketing guy with access to business accounts.
In the course of performing these duties, Cruz discovered that about 90% of the accounts he received were either fraudulent or suspicious. That is, when he would attempt to contact any of these clients, say, at their businesses, he would find the business did not exist (think barren weeded warehouses), or that there would be no obvious activity happening (no office furniture, no workers, you get the picture). When he contacted individuals, those people were unaware that their names were being used in conjunction with a business, and those people were either past HSBC customers or victims of identity fraud through credit cards.
Since numerous laws including the PATRIOT ACT required Cruz to notify at least one of his superiors of these many breaches in practice and law, if not other regulatory agencies as well, he went ahead and did so, lest he be seen as the one breaking the law. After all, he liked his job at that point.
Well, this is what got Cruz fired not but two years after landing the job, for “poor performance”. One wonders how one could perform well with only 10% of a client base with which to work.
When he brought these cases up to management, he was told that there was no problem and that he was imagining it, and when he went to HSBC security, they told Cruz they were “prevented by executive senior management of the bank from doing anything about accounts like this”.
Cruz noted that these accounts were being used to transfer via telephone (never with checks) large sums of money — in the hundreds of thousands to millions of dollars — to and from accounts which were not on record with the bank. This, Cruz guessed, would total something easily into the billions or even low trillions of dollars of money laundering. Cruz further guessed, probably correctly, that HSBC senior management knew of and was participating in and likely profiting from the scheme. “From what I saw, I came to suspect HSBC had become the Mexican drug cartels’ bank of choice,” he said.
So at this point, I’m thinking, “maybe I should check out my local HSBC Bank branch to see whether there is an account worth millions in my name.” I’m thinking we all should check on this, just to be certain, and withdraw all funds if there is.
Cruz started wearing a wire, on his own, and copied about a thousand pages of documentation of the suspected laundering activity. After recording conversations with management, he took his case to Jeremy Scileppi, bureau chief of the Suffolk County District Attorney’s office on Long Island.
“Scileppi was no more interested in hearing what I had to say than was the HSBC senior bank management,” Cruz said. “I got stonewalled. That’s when I decided to write a book.”
Titled “World Banking World Fraud: Using Your Identity,” Cruz’s book was published on 7 October 2011. Cruz then took his book and documents to Corsi, who talked about them on the Coast show on 6 February 2012.
That’s where it all gets interesting.
Corsi used to be in banking, before becoming an investigative journalist, and Corsi loves whistleblowers.
Corsi, on Coast, mentioned that there would be no way that such millions would be able to be transferred with such regularity to or from any bank, much less the London-based HSBC, without attracting the attention of the US-based Federal Reserve Banking System.
Now the Federal Reserve is not a government agency, but is a collection of private banks organized in a system with tight, and basically illegal, control over the United States currency supply. So I agreed with Corsi; the Fed must have known about this, and if so, then they were obviously just as well involved in the money laundering and illegal profiteering. After all, no sane person would let that many billions or trillions slide without at least taking a cut, unless they were being blackmailed or something.
So now to recap; we have the drug cartels laundering the drug money from the drug users in the United States through HSBC (and perhaps other institutions like PayPal and AmEx — see Corsi’s third article), while HSBC and the Fed take a cut and let the process go unhindered. How many snakes is that?
So how does Corsi or Cruz for that matter know it was drug money? Well, maybe it’s not, but who else makes that much money in that short of a period of time (I know, Big Pharma and Big Oil) and still needs to launder it through ficticious accounts? (Right, drug cartels.)
And all the HSBC high level executives know about this? Undoubtedly. Will it be investigated? Well, hopefully; let’s find out. This should be one of the biggest news stories of 2012. But will it be? Again….
Now, you may ask, does Fed Chair Ben Bernanke know about this? Quite possibly. Do the individual twelve Fed Bank Chiefs know? Almost certainly. Does US Treasury Secretary Tim Geithner know? Maybe. How about Dubya or Obama? Hmmmm…. I wonder.
But I know who absolutely has to know, since it is their job to know these things, and that is the CIA. And if the CIA knows, you can bet the FBI is out of the loop. Corsi agrees with me using other logic.
Corsi figures that at least $2T (that’s two trillion dollars) annually goes to the US black market in drug use. That might seem high, considering spreading that total out over the US population of 400M people gives you $5000 spent annually per person. But then I thought about all those Wall Street Bankster and Hollywood Insider parties Featuring Charlie Sheen, and Corsi might be about right. I’m going to leave Corsi in the dust for the rest of this article, though.
The CIA has a number of “Black Ops” (programs or operations which are to be kept secret from the public, like the Bin Laden raid) that need to be funded every year. The problem with funding black ops is that by publicly funding them, even by just stating the actual total of the funding, you make the black ops a little less black. So what does the CIA do to counter this problem? They “earn” the money needed to fund their black ops. Blackly.
We’re not talking about bake sales here.
The LA Times did an article about ten years back detailing how the crack cocaine epidemic was started in LA because the drug was created by the CIA (just add baking soda?) to fund a CIA black op in Nicaragua, giving arms and other support (like mining Contra ports) to the Sandinista government to keep the fight going between the US-publicly-backed Contras and the Sandinistas, so that more US taxpayer money could be thrown at the Nicaraguan civil war. War costs more if you do it longer. This is also good for banks. The CIA also helped to intensify the US War on Drugs using this same operation (thereby providing even more money for various LEOs). This is a great dual example of the use of the Hegelian Dialectic. You can wiki any and all of this.
At any rate, the CIA was actively involved in selling drugs. It still is (why are we in Afghanistan? Opium!). It has found that line of business quite profitable historically and quite useful when it comes to funding their black ops, and keeping that funding black.
And those are just two examples. The CIA created the Mujahadeen (precursors of the Taliban and Al-Qaeda), and therefore the “war on terrorism”. The CIA was deeply involved in the coup d’etat which in 1953 overthrew the popularly elected Prime Minister of Iran Mohammad Mosaddegh so that they could install the Shah into absolute power, which immediately benefited Big Oil, setting the stage for the 1979 Iranian revolution which brought the Ayatollah and his Shiite successors to power, to now threaten Israel with nukes. The CIA even created an asset (a person who will carry out tasks for the CIA when asked), internally known as Tim O’Brien, although most of us knew him as Osama Bin Laden (the CIA trained him in Egypt).
So you see, as it turns out, the CIA has quite a good track record (or bad, depending on who you ask) of getting the “correct” leaders in power using drugs and drug money directly, or indirectly through funding their operations. In this case, correct means that those leaders will willfully do your bidding, or, in this case, the bidding of the CIA and the Bilderberg Group.
If you do not know what the Bilderberg Group is and who composes it, I again very strongly suggest that you read up on that, right now. I’ll save your place, just close the new tab or window after you’re done. Go ahead, I’ll wait.
Okay, you’re back. So now I take it that you have figured out that the Bilderbergers are an insanely wealthy group of oligarchs intent on world domination and a return to feudalism and serfdom for the rest of us who are not to be simply killed off, while they pursue life extension technologies and get to fly to other planets on our cool black triangular shaped AGV craft, right? What, didn’t you read the part about the Georgia Guidestones? Okay, I’ll wait; read the ten inscriptions, please.
All right then, let’s recap again. Let’s see if I can get this right.
So the Bilderbergers who want to control everything, and who do control politicians of all parties in most countries, along with the CIA, and by extension most militias, wars, conflicts, and whatnot, do so all for the benefit of the banks, the owners of which mostly comprise the members in the Bilderberg Group. The CIA uses the drug money which is laundered through these same banks (which create economic crises to make those already rich even richer) to accomplish the goals of the Bilderbergers, of which Ben Bernanke is a member, and all of whom directly benefit in both power and money from these processes. I’ll bet anyone ten grand (even Romney) that there are about 3,600 snakes on that Medusa head.
So now we are all talking about a war between Israel and Iran. I heard the other day that someone in the US government suggested that it was actually Iran that flew the airplanes into the WTC towers. I guess Iran must have flown that invisible plane into 7 WTC. No, silly, it was Pakistan’s ISI (their CIA) and Israel’s Mossad (their CIA) who organized the whole thing. Aside from the fact that at least 13 of the 19 supposed terrorists turned up alive since 9/11 (yes, true, again, look it up), most of those suspected terrorists were from Saudi Arabia, and the others from Pakistan, with one from Afghanistan. That, of course, is why we had to invade Afghanistan, and then Iraq. What now, Iran?
Franklin Delano Roosevelt made sure that our aircraft carriers were not in Pearl Harbor and that the radar was down for repair on the morning of 7 December 1941 because his New Deal policies were not pulling the US out of depression, and he figured that a full-scale war with Germany, Italy and Japan could recreate the manufacturing base required to reinvigorate the US economy. It turned out that he was right about the economy, but it did not prevent him from committing Treason that day.
The trouble making that 2012 analogy is that war between Iran and Israel would undoubtedly involve Russia and then China, and barring a new wave of isolationism within the US, it would involve our nation as well, and would very likely go nuclear, since Israel has built up quite a stockpile of nukes over the last 26 years since Mordechai Vannanu started reporting on it.
If we legalized drugs, regulated and taxed them, we would have plenty of money to give to Iran to stop them from developing nukes, not to mention for jobs, education, green energy development, ending poverty, social security and really whatever, but where would the CIA get all the black money for their black ops? Into what new nefarious ventures might they delve, hurting everyone in the process? Not that I’m arguing against legalization, because I’m not, but perhaps the CIA and all the Banksters are just too expensive to keep around. I will need a body double before I travel to Dealey Plaza.
If the CIA wants to do something which is actually useful, it should get the Iranian Green Revolution which started in February 2010 into power, since most Iranians, by a landslide, do not want war with Israel. No one who I know here wants war with Iran. But then again, no one I know is a Bilderberger. They want a situation where every 13 out of 14 people living now will be dead. You’ve got to ask yourself one question: “Do I feel lucky?” Well do ya, punk?
We cannot begin another Great Game, this time with Persia as the prize.
The problem is that we are making a repeat performance of the events leading up to the illegal invasion of Iraq in late 2002 and 2003, and while I suspect that Iran is actually enriching uranium and to a lesser degree plutonium to produce weapons-grade materiel, I think it would be wisest in this case to offer to lift all sanctions and restore diplomatic relations with Iran only if they would turn over all nuclear production to Russia and/or the IAEA, so that it could be used only for peaceful power generation. In fact, I think it would be even more wise to convince Iran to drop the nuclear program altogether and pursue wind, wave, solar and tidal energies exclusively, just like we should do, and just like Germany is doing already.
The nightmare would be the prescribed culling of the population to 500 million via a nuclear WWIII, but that would be letting the snakes win, and I still have a machete.
I actually do quite often have prognosticative dreams which turn out to be metaphorical, and occasionally literal. More often, they have happier endings, but there is no reason this one cannot have an ending where the figurative Medusa head is obliterated.
That kind of stuff/people absolutely hate(s) it when you shine the Light of Truth on it/them.
With the Light of Truth and Love, We All Will Take The Power Back!
Vote Green!!! Vote Oatman!!!